Effused_-_We_Are_One-(XBONE028)-WEB-2014-HB

Dec 2014
19:29

320 kbps
9 mb

Sinapse

WebHardstyleX-Bone

NFO

ARTIST..[ Effused
TITLE...[ We Are One
GENRE...[ Techno
SOURCE..[ WEB
LABEL...[ X-Bone
CAT NR..[ XBONE028
ENCODER.[ LAME 3.98
TRACKS..[ 01
LENGTH..[ 04:16 min
SIZE....[ 9,8 MB
QUALITY.[ 320kbps / 44,1kHz / Joint-Stereo
DATE....[ Dec-04-2014
URL.....[ www.hardstyle.com

NOTES
LiKe??? = BuY!!!

TRACKLIST
NR. TRACKNAME                                             TIME
01  We Are One                                            04:16

                                               TOTAL[ 04:16 min
                                               SIZE.[   9,8 mb

Download links

Alerte!

https://rapidgator.net/file/c59ab93723926459915e575adaca6cec/Effused_-_We_Are_One-(XBONE028)-WEB-2014-HB.rar.html

Report invalid link

Comments ( 2 )

This track is not DJ friendly. Listen closely at the end.
At 03:44, a new set of 16 beats starts. But it only has 12!
The only thing a DJ can do is either edit this track by him/herself and add 4 beats or delete the portion of 12 beats entirely.
OR
Delay mixing untill 03:48 ( at this bpm of course ).

Do those label managers even listen to those tracks before releasing it??
Do they have the knowledge about the technical aspect of modern ( dance ) music?
Not to mention the artist himself or in this case "themselves" because Effused are 2 guys.
I heard this error from the first time I listened to this song and I am not even a producer nor a DJ.

I know that not all music has this type of structure but it certainly not appears in dance-music which is commonly used for mixing.
A few exceptions can be possible during a break or at the beginning of a track when the main rhythm hasn't started yet.
But certainly NOT in the outro like in this track.

rUsHnUt
09 Dec 2014 - 16:12

reply
quote

I've edited the track myself.
I added 4 beats to make it DJ friendly.
I know I know, quality loss due to decompressing & recompressing bla bla bla.
I did this for those who are interested ( for example: people who make mixes and upload on youtube where sound quality is already reduced so it doesn't matter... )
By the way I use decent software for this so it isn't noticable to the human ear when using daily household audio equipment.
So I don't wanna hear any comments like: "Fixing it? You 're making it worse."
If you don't like it, fine. Everyone is free to "not download my version and stick to the original file".

Anyway, here's the link ( for as long as it isn't removed )
http://www31.zippyshare.com/v/16680314/file.html

Ah yeah: About this track; that bass!! Awesome. Period.

rUsHnUt
09 Dec 2014 - 16:12