Tha_Artistz_vs_Kamikaze_-_Earthquake-(AH054)-WEB-2014-HB

17
Jun 2014
22:46
13
320 kbps
12 mb
Sinapse
WebHardstyleAussie Hardstyle
No votes yet

NFO
ARTIST..[ Tha Artistz vs Kamikaze
TITLE...[ Earthquake
GENRE...[ Techno
SOURCE..[ WEB
LABEL...[ Aussie Hardstyle
CAT NR..[ AH054
ENCODER.[ LAME 3.98
TRACKS..[ 01
LENGTH..[ 05:23 min
SIZE....[ 12,4 MB
QUALITY.[ 320kbps / 44,1kHz / Joint-Stereo
DATE....[ Jun-17-2014
URL.....[ www.hardstyle.com

NOTES
LiKe??? = BuY!!!

TRACKLIST
NR. TRACKNAME                                             TIME
01  Earthquake                                            05:23

                                               TOTAL[ 05:23 min
                                               SIZE.[  12,4 mb

Download linksAlerte!

Report invalid link

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
f
X
F
M
q
6
Enter the code without spaces and pay attention to upper/lower case.

Comments ( 13 )
#1

Just so everyone knows, Kamikaze don't produce their own tracks. Their only solo release so far was produced by Noiseshock.

#2

Noiseshock - is that guy still around?

#3

Can't get rid of him D:

#4

Also not a great track considering Aussie Hardstyle Label's great reputation!

#5

weak track, so boring! :(

#6

The girls are shit DJ's anyway. Only popular cause they are female

#7

That's pretty sexist no?
Day-Mar & Deetox produce their own tracks.

#8

Most females in hardcore produce absolutely terrible stuff, with some not even producing their own stuff and having a ghost producer, but saying that, most men producing hardcore make shit too.
I'm sure there's a few others I'm forgetting but the only credible female producers I know of are Goetia and Ybrid, along with Liza 'N' Eliaz back in the day.

#9

What??? Day-mar's tracks are made by Negative-A and Drokz..

#10

It's not sexist. It's the truth.

#11

Not being sexist, I'm saying they wouldn't be popular in Australia if they were males

#12

lol this track is old, obviously it doesnt sound as good quality as it was made almost 2 years ago.

#13

Do you mean the quality isn't as good for 2 years old because the producers weren't as experienced at producing 2 years ago, or because that production of tracks in general wasn't as good as it is now, 2 years ago?
If it's the latter I don't agree with you because there's plenty of stuff that's even around 15 years old or more that sounds as well made and polished as today's stuff, although this is talking from a hardcore techno perspective.

Post new comment

Don't ask for zippy. All reuploads/requests here: http://xprm.net Avoid abusive language. Write in English. Advertising & spam is not allowed. Random censorship enabled.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
B
9
Y
d
S
N
Enter the code without spaces and pay attention to upper/lower case.